jmproffitt

breaking the 140-character barrier 

GigaOm says "BlackBerry Should End This Tour" Yikes.

The Tour has turned out to be quite a lemon. The trackball is behaving like a 300-pound man running up a hill. Tour hangs when I am trying to send text messages or check MLB scores. There is a strange clicking sound that accompanies phone calls; furthermore, folks are complaining of a strange whooshing noise when I call them. And if all that weren’t enough — Tour’s battery dries up faster than raindrops in the Sahara.

OUCH! BlackBerry is getting a black eye with their latest phone.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Dog Park Confessional Tweetup (video)

Dog Park Confessional Tweetup from John Proffitt on Vimeo.

Learn more about this Tweetup and others in the Anchorage, Alaska area at AlaskaTweets.com.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Stitched iPhone panorama of Chugach Mountains

Shot from a parking garage on the Providence Hospital campus in Anchorage. Fall is here and it's gorgeous.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [3]

Netflix culture: You know you want to work here

Culture
View more presentations from reed2001.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Jimmy Carter: Losing my religion for equality

Jimmy Carter
July 15, 2009

Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.

I have been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Christianity   discrimination   equality   ethics   girls   jimmy carter   politics   religion   Southern Baptists   women  

Comments [0]

Bad Boy, Bad Boy... Whatcha gonna name him?

This kid's name is probably Alec, Ernest, Garland, Ivan, Kareem, Luke, Malcolm, Preston, Tyrell or Walter

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [2]

Diminishing Returns of Collaboration

Great post on collaboration and multitasking and what's realistically possible. No specific numbers, but good thinking on how well we can -- or can't -- work together on projects.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Atlantis, in orbit, against the sun

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Google studies TV ad watching, proposes customized ads for broadcast

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/tuning-in-to-tv-data.html

"Each week, Google analyzes data from millions of anonymized set-top boxes (STBs) to see which channels they were tuned to second by second."

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

My own comments on the NPR/Cokie Roberts brouhaha started by Jack Shafer at Slate.com

Yes, Shafer would have written it at any time. He’s a take-no-prisoners commentator. Not always right, but most of the time he hits the target.

As for Roberts, I know someone that worked at NPR years ago and that person’s assessment of what Roberts offers is pretty much the same as Shafer’s — and that was from, say, 10 years ago. Not much has changed. It’s just that NPR folks don’t speak ill of their own. At least not publicly.

Roberts is paid a pretty penny to provide conventional wisdom on Monday mornings. I suppose it’s a sort of tribute payment to her for the early years of work she put in at the then-nascent NPR and because of her Senatorial parentage. Her “connections,” in theory, give her “access” to insider info and perspectives that we get to hear.

Yet the chattering classes in DC all talk to each other incessantly (and the press is in on it), so there’s really no “insider” information Roberts can offer that we haven’t already heard elsewhere.

All that said, I like Roberts well enough. But NPR could cut this cost and little to nothing of objective value would be lost.

Next up: Daniel Schorr, another perennial listener favorite that offers occasional warmed-over platitudes in an insight-free (and innoffensive) way. Roberts and Schorr are familiar and “comforting” voices for long-time listeners, but they don’t offer enough substance to justify their payroll expenses when so many real reporters — folks working in the field to produce original reporting — have been laid off at NPR.

One true test of good management is whether you can assess a situation without bias, face up to the facts and then take decisive action. These are two instances where NPR has taken the easy road — perhaps because of the scalding that came with showing Bob Edwards the door (a tough, but justified and ultimately successful, move).

Original Slate article: http://www.slate.com/id/2216890/

ConverStation article where my comment is posted: http://theconverstation.org/2009/05/06/slates-shafer-not-coo-coo-for-cokie/

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]